Post by jannati55123 on May 19, 2024 5:56:55 GMT
Thus if the officials themselves were negligent under these articles then the defence that the people at the assembly were negligent themselves would not be considered a legitimate defence. The officials can also be held liable under Articles and . Apart from the above liability if it is proved that any person contracted the disease only at the assembly or polling station these officials can also be held liable under Article.
Further if the level of infection was so high that it almost endangered the life of the patient the officials would be held liable under Article . More seriously if it is proved that the person died due to the infection the officials Slovakia Email List can be held liable under Article . taken judicial notice of the deaths of people on election duty during the elections in the state due to noncompliance with social distancing norms in the counting areas. The liability under the Disaster Management Act Section of the Act may also make them liable as they did not follow the instructions issued by the government under this Act.
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs has made it mandatory to strictly follow the wearing of masks in public places. The refusal of officials to wear masks during the elections may make them liable under this provision. In addition Section further provides that if any crime is committed by a particular department the head of the department shall be liable. The act of the Election Commission in not making testing mandatory during the elections makes its officials liable under Section of the Act. Conclusion It is clear that the facts show that these incidents are clear injustices to the people.
Further if the level of infection was so high that it almost endangered the life of the patient the officials would be held liable under Article . More seriously if it is proved that the person died due to the infection the officials Slovakia Email List can be held liable under Article . taken judicial notice of the deaths of people on election duty during the elections in the state due to noncompliance with social distancing norms in the counting areas. The liability under the Disaster Management Act Section of the Act may also make them liable as they did not follow the instructions issued by the government under this Act.
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs has made it mandatory to strictly follow the wearing of masks in public places. The refusal of officials to wear masks during the elections may make them liable under this provision. In addition Section further provides that if any crime is committed by a particular department the head of the department shall be liable. The act of the Election Commission in not making testing mandatory during the elections makes its officials liable under Section of the Act. Conclusion It is clear that the facts show that these incidents are clear injustices to the people.