Post by Joyuseoto57 on Oct 21, 2023 11:33:38 GMT
Experiments have shown for the first time that a conversation between a human and a machine can be carried out using human natural language. But the most important finding was that people tended to assign meaning to chatbot messages themselves, mistaking it for machine-assigned meaning to text. Subsequently, this phenomenon was called the Eliza effect. There's no artificial intelligence, and it's just a simple algorithm by today's standards, but it creates the illusion of a full conversation, and for some users it does have a somewhat psychotherapeutic effect. Modern trainable chatbots are much smarter than their ancestors, making them more effective interlocutors, sometimes with potentiation.
At the beginning of the year, the American magazine published an article about how a moible number data US non-profit mental health organization replaced experts with chatbots as an experiment without informing customers. The chatbot managed to consult about people. Customers rate messages they receive from chatbots more highly than messages written by experts. But when they found out they were talking to a chatbot, they were upset and criticized the company. People appreciate a consultant's work if they don't know they're communicating with AI. with people, they devalue the experience.
University of Rio de Janeiro have concluded that psychological assistance provided by machines rather than humans should not be assessed as more useful or useful. It is more important to identify and identify the limits of this assistance, rather than belittle it or, conversely, idealize it. Chatbots can be a very useful resource for those who want to improve their mental literacy, develop soft skills, or get quick and automated psychological support. But it is important to choose chatbots as well as good experts to be conscious and moderately critical.
At the beginning of the year, the American magazine published an article about how a moible number data US non-profit mental health organization replaced experts with chatbots as an experiment without informing customers. The chatbot managed to consult about people. Customers rate messages they receive from chatbots more highly than messages written by experts. But when they found out they were talking to a chatbot, they were upset and criticized the company. People appreciate a consultant's work if they don't know they're communicating with AI. with people, they devalue the experience.
University of Rio de Janeiro have concluded that psychological assistance provided by machines rather than humans should not be assessed as more useful or useful. It is more important to identify and identify the limits of this assistance, rather than belittle it or, conversely, idealize it. Chatbots can be a very useful resource for those who want to improve their mental literacy, develop soft skills, or get quick and automated psychological support. But it is important to choose chatbots as well as good experts to be conscious and moderately critical.